FlashKeepers

Supreme Court Cases · High School · School

Supreme Court Landmarks: Criminal Justice and Due Process

Gideon, Miranda, Mapp, Terry, Gregg, and other Bill of Rights criminal procedure cases.

About this set

40 basic cards for High School Supreme Court Cases. Set 2 of 5 in Supreme Court Landmarks. It opens with "In Gideon v. Wainwright, what Sixth Amendment right did the Court recognize for" and "Who was the defendant in Gideon v. Wainwright?". Study it alongside the other High School sets below.

40 cards · basic cards · AI-written, checked twice. Edit anything.

Study this set free Look inside first Get FlashKeepers for iPhone

Opens in your browser, no account. Get the iPhone and iPad app · Android app

In Gideon v. Wainwright, what Sixth Amendment right did the Court recognize for all criminal defendants?
Show answerRight to counsel; if defendant cannot afford it, one must be provided free of charge
Who was the defendant in Gideon v. Wainwright?
Show answerClarence Gideon
What crime was Clarence Gideon accused of in Gideon v. Wainwright?
Show answerBreaking and entering and larceny (burglary of a pool hall)
In what year was Gideon v. Wainwright decided?
Show answer1963
Argersinger v. Hamlin extended Gideon's right to counsel to what cases?
Show answerMisdemeanor cases where the defendant faces imprisonment
What was the constitutional basis for the Gideon ruling?
Show answerSixth Amendment guarantees the right to assistance of counsel
What are the four Miranda warnings that must be given before custodial interrogation?
Show answerRight to remain silent, statements can be used against you in court, right to speak to an attorney, attorney will be provided if you cannot afford one
In what year was Miranda v. Arizona decided?
Show answer1966
What crime was the defendant charged with in Miranda v. Arizona?
Show answerKidnapping and rape
According to New York v. Quarles, when is the public safety exception to Miranda warnings used?
Show answerWhen police need to question a suspect about an immediate threat to public safety before giving warnings
What did Harris v. New York hold about Miranda violations?
Show answerStatements obtained in violation of Miranda can be used to impeach (challenge the credibility of) a defendant who testifies
What does the exclusionary rule provide?
Show answerEvidence obtained in violation of constitutional rights cannot be used in a criminal prosecution
What did Mapp v. Ohio establish?
Show answerExclusionary rule applies to state criminal proceedings, not just federal cases
What type of search was at issue in Mapp v. Ohio?
Show answerPolice searched a home without a warrant looking for a bombing suspect; they found obscene materials instead
In what year was Mapp v. Ohio decided?
Show answer1961

25 more cards in the app

Study this set free