FlashKeepers

LSAT · LSAT · Test Prep

LSAT Logical Reasoning: Flaws and Argument Types

Common flawed argument patterns (correlation-causation, equivocation, circular reasoning) and argument structures tested in LSAT logical reasoning, distinct from the vocabulary-focused logic terminology deck.

About this set

33 basic cards for LSAT LSAT. Set 1 of 2 in LSAT Logical Reasoning. It opens with "What error occurs when an argument treats a correlation between two things as" and "What is the flaw when an argument uses the same word in two different senses?". More Test Prep decks are listed below.

33 cards · basic cards · AI-written, checked twice. Edit anything.

Study this set free Look inside first Get FlashKeepers for iPhone

Opens in your browser, no account. Get the iPhone and iPad app · Android app

What error occurs when an argument treats a correlation between two things as proof that one causes the other?
Show answerCorrelation-causation confusion
What is the flaw when an argument uses the same word in two different senses?
Show answerEquivocation
What fallacy occurs when an argument uses its conclusion as evidence for itself?
Show answerCircular reasoning (or begging the question)
What error attacks the person making an argument rather than the argument itself?
Show answerAd hominem
What fallacy invokes an expert or authority on a topic outside their area of expertise?
Show answerAppeal to inappropriate authority
What error occurs when an argument generalizes from a small, unrepresentative sample?
Show answerHasty generalization
What fallacy presents only two options when more than two actually exist?
Show answerFalse dichotomy (or false dilemma)
What error occurs when an argument misrepresents an opponent's view to make it easier to attack?
Show answerStrawman argument
What fallacy introduces irrelevant information to distract from the main argument?
Show answerRed herring
What error assumes that because B followed A in time, A must have caused B?
Show answerPost hoc ergo propter hoc
What is the flaw in this conditional reasoning: If P then Q. Q is true, so P is true?
Show answerAffirming the consequent
What is the flaw in this conditional reasoning: If P then Q. P is false, so Q is false?
Show answerDenying the antecedent
What fallacy argues that if one step is permitted, a chain of bad consequences will inevitably follow?
Show answerSlippery slope
What error argues that something is true because most people believe it?
Show answerAppeal to popularity (or appeal to the masses)
What error argues that something should be done because it has always been done that way?
Show answerAppeal to tradition

18 more cards in the app

Study this set free