Common flawed argument patterns (correlation-causation, equivocation, circular reasoning) and argument structures tested in LSAT logical reasoning, distinct from the vocabulary-focused logic terminology deck.
33 cards · basic cards · AI-written, checked twice. Edit anything.
- What error occurs when an argument treats a correlation between two things as proof that one causes the other?
- Correlation-causation confusion
- What is the flaw when an argument uses the same word in two different senses?
- Equivocation
- What fallacy occurs when an argument uses its conclusion as evidence for itself?
- Circular reasoning (or begging the question)
- What error attacks the person making an argument rather than the argument itself?
- Ad hominem
- What fallacy invokes an expert or authority on a topic outside their area of expertise?
- Appeal to inappropriate authority
- What error occurs when an argument generalizes from a small, unrepresentative sample?
- Hasty generalization
- What fallacy presents only two options when more than two actually exist?
- False dichotomy (or false dilemma)
- What error occurs when an argument misrepresents an opponent's view to make it easier to attack?
- Strawman argument
- What fallacy introduces irrelevant information to distract from the main argument?
- Red herring
- What error assumes that because B followed A in time, A must have caused B?
- Post hoc ergo propter hoc
- What is the flaw in this conditional reasoning: If P then Q. Q is true, so P is true?
- Affirming the consequent
- What is the flaw in this conditional reasoning: If P then Q. P is false, so Q is false?
- Denying the antecedent
- What fallacy argues that if one step is permitted, a chain of bad consequences will inevitably follow?
- Slippery slope
- What error argues that something is true because most people believe it?
- Appeal to popularity (or appeal to the masses)
- What error argues that something should be done because it has always been done that way?
- Appeal to tradition