FlashKeepers

Law · Law School · Professional Certifications

Evidence: Relevance, Hearsay, and Privileges

Federal Rules of Evidence basics, hearsay exceptions, character evidence, impeachment, and privileges.

About this set

45 basic cards for Law School Law. It opens with "Under FRE 401, what makes evidence relevant?" and "What is the standard for excluding relevant evidence under FRE 403?". More Professional Certifications decks are listed below.

45 cards · basic cards · AI-written, checked twice. Edit anything.

Study this set free Look inside first Get FlashKeepers for iPhone

Opens in your browser, no account. Get the iPhone and iPad app · Android app

Under FRE 401, what makes evidence relevant?
Show answerEvidence that has any tendency to make a fact of consequence more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
What is the standard for excluding relevant evidence under FRE 403?
Show answerEvidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of unfair prejudice, confusion, misleading the jury, undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
What is conditional relevance under FRE 104(b)?
Show answerWhen evidence is relevant only if a preliminary fact is true, the evidence may be admitted if the proponent introduces sufficient evidence that a reasonable jury could find the preliminary fact to be true.
Define hearsay under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Show answerAn out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
What is an excited utterance and why is it a hearsay exception?
Show answerA statement made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event, admitted because the spontaneity and immediacy of the statement suggest reliability.
What is a present sense impression and when does it apply?
Show answerA statement describing an event made while the declarant is perceiving the event or immediately afterward, admitted because simultaneous with perception suggests accuracy.
When is a statement about the declarant's then-existing state of mind admissible?
Show answerA statement is admissible to prove the declarant's then-existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition, but not to prove prior events (except in will cases).
What is the dying declaration exception to hearsay?
Show answerA statement made while the declarant believed death was imminent, concerning the cause or circumstances of the impending death, admissible in civil cases and homicides.
What is a statement against interest and when is it admissible?
Show answerA statement that was against the declarant's pecuniary, proprietary, or penal interest when made, admissible when the declarant is unavailable and the circumstances suggest reliability.
What is forfeiture by wrongdoing in hearsay?
Show answerWhen a party has wrongfully caused a declarant's unavailability, that party forfeits the hearsay objection and the statement becomes admissible.
What is the business records exception to hearsay?
Show answerA record of an act, event, condition, opinion, or diagnosis made at or near the time by someone with knowledge, kept in the course of a regularly conducted business, is admissible.
What is the public records exception to hearsay?
Show answerA record or statement made by a public office or agency if it sets out the office's activities, a matter the office was required to observe, or factual findings from a legally authorized investigation, is admissible.
What is the ancient documents exception to hearsay?
Show answerA document that is at least 20 years old, whose authenticity is established, and that contains statements about specific facts, is admissible as an exception to hearsay.
What is the residual hearsay exception under FRE 807?
Show answerA hearsay statement is admissible if the declarant is unavailable, the statement is more probative on the point than any other evidence, and allowing it serves the interests of justice.
What does FRE 404(a) say about character evidence for conduct?
Show answerCharacter evidence is not admissible to prove that a person acted in accordance with that character, except when character is directly in issue or in specified criminal defendant/victim scenarios.

30 more cards in the app

Study this set free